Search This Blog

Showing posts with label Yahoo!. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Yahoo!. Show all posts

Monday, October 31, 2016

OLD NOTES - Yahoo Work Shop SEM Campaign Optimization Action Plan


Allan Chuate, Search Strategy/optimization

Keyword
Keyword expansion:  search query report
Singular, plural and misspell should be bid separately
Negative keywords – 
  • -help optimize broach & phrase, 
  • -works different from Google, 
  • -when set at lower leverls, overrides those at higher levels within a campaign
  • Are limited at 10k at ad groups & campaign levels
  • Are no longer normalized (Education: Negative keyword “Bachelor” – is linked to “Bachelors”.  Education vertical wants “Bachelor” but not “bachelors”).
  • Negative keywords are applied as “negative phrase match” – same order/next to each other.  Bid keyword = stock quote  ; Negative keyword = free quote time.  Free quote time – is served, stock quote free quote time – is not served
Ad serving:
CTR threshold
Min_bid = 0.05
Landing page: adcenter crawls LP’s to determine relevance
Best practice:  
  1. Monitor QS and correct low performing components
  2. Incr min_bid
  3. Ensure landing page is directly relevant to user query and keyword

Content Match:

Site Targeting – new – include Yahoo properties (Y! Answers, Astrology, Auto, Groups, Health, Movies), Microsoft: Hotmail, MSNBC.com
Use website placement performance report in ad center to track by site
Use site that convert well for Display
Use other targeting /bid boosting layers to reach more specific audience

JOE STEPHENS:
Insights: 

Quality Score – competitiveness in overall market,  landing page relevance, user experience  - accesses at account level for sites using excessive links.  Displayed at KW level to better indicate and address the specific KW.  Same keyword/Different match type = different QS

Exact Match –
Explicit vs. Implicit bidding - 

Ad copy optimization -


Targeting -

OLD NOTES - SEM reporting channels' PRO v.s. CON - MSN Adcenter, Google Adwords, Marin

Reporting:

Here is a list of the different reporting systems we use on a day to day basis and some of the pros/cons (what they can provide and can’t).  Happy to review this today or tomorrow.

  1. Hourly Report and IntraDay Report in LDS
    1. Pros:  
      1. Hourly by channel (SEM, Media, etc)
      2. Shows landing page flow: GC -> rEC – rlead -> ulead -> umlead.  Another way to say it is: click from google (GC) -> user gives zip (rEC) -> user fills lead (ulead) -> lead gets sold (umlead).
      3. Intraday is same.  Breaks out account level.
      4. First indicator something isn’t right.
    2. Cons: 
      1. No revenue.
      2. Account/channel level only.
      3. No costs.
  2. CMP Report in LDS
    1. Pros:
      1. Revenue for any date range. All sources, accounts, and adids.
      2. Adds bounce rate and multiplier added.
      3. Overall and Marketplace Margin.
      4. Good for identifying tracking issues.
    2. Cons:
      1. Account/adid level only.
      2. By day only.
      3. Delayed Costs (1 day).
  3. Publishers (Google Adwords and MSN Adcenter)
    1. Pros:
      1. Keyword level.
      2. Sometimes has Conversions.
      3. Hourly breakouts (with 2-4 hour delays)
      4. True traffic (won’t see bots).
    2. Cons:
      1. Can’t see revenue
      2. Slow to look at all sources or isolate drops.
  4. Marin
    1. Pros:
      1. Cost and Revenue
      2. Keyword Level
      3. Any Time Frame
      4. Makes Bid Recommendations
    2. Cons:
      1. 1 Day Delay in Data
      2. Can’t do intraday or hourly


OLD NOTES - Yahoo! Quality score



Popular Posts